 |
| |
 |
iClicker |
 |
Back to iClicker page
Activity ideas for iClickers
Teaching with iClickers
can take a number of directions. You will want to match
activities to course content, time constraints, learning
objectives, and your and your students' unique teaching
and learning styles. Some possibilities for iClicker
activities include the following, listed more or less in
order of increasing levels of student engagement. |
|
|
- Attendance:
Clickers can be used to take attendance directly
(e.g. asking students to respond to the question
“Are you here today?”) or indirectly by determining
which students used their clickers during class.
- Summative Assessment:
Clickers can be used for graded activities, such as
multiple-choice quizzes or even tests. Some brands
of clickers allow for a “student-paced” mode in
which students answer questions on a printed test at
their own pace.
- Formative Assessment:
Clickers can be used to pose questions to students
and collect their answers for the purpose of
providing real-time information about student
learning to both the instructor and the students.
Students can use this feedback to monitor their own
learning, and instructors can use it to change how
they manage class “on the fly” in response to
student learning needs. Some brands of clickers
allow students to register their confidence level
(high, medium, or low) along with their answer,
providing more detailed feedback to the
instructor.Some instructors assign participation
grades to these kinds of formative assessments to
encourage students to participate. Other instructors
assign points for correct answers to encourage
students to take these questions more seriously.
Other instructors do a mix of both, assigning
partial credit for wrong answers.
- Homework Collection:
Some brands of clickers allow students to record
their answers to multiple-choice or free response
homework questions outside of class and submit their
answers via the clickers at the start of class.
- Discussion Warm-Up:
Posing a question, giving students time to
think about it and record their answers via
clickers, and then displaying the results can be an
effective way to warm a class up for a class-wide
discussion. Compared with the approach of taking the
first hand that is raised after a question is asked,
this approach gives all students time to think about
and commit to an answer, setting the stage for
greater discussion participation.
- Contingent Teaching:
Since it can occasionally be challenging to
determine what students understand and what they do
not understand, clickers can be used to gauge that
in real-time during class and modify one’s lesson
plan accordingly. If the clicker data show that
students understand a given topic, then the
instructor can move on to the next one. If not, then
more time can be spent on the topic, perhaps
involving more lecture, class discussion, or another
clicker question.
- Peer Instruction:
The teacher poses a question to his or her students.
The students ponder the question silently and
transmit their individual answers using the
clickers. The teacher checks the histogram of
student responses. If significant numbers of
students choose the wrong answer, the teacher
instructs the students to discuss the question with
their neighbor. After a few minutes of discussion,
the students submit their answers again. This
technique often (but not always!) results in more
students choosing the correct answer as a result of
the peer instruction phase of the activity. This is
a fairly simple way to use clickers to engage a
large number of students in discussions about course
material. This approach can also set the stage for a
class-wide discussion that more fully engages all
students. See
Mazur for more on this approach.
- Repeated Questions:
In the peer instruction approach described
above, students respond to a given question
twice–once after thinking about their answer
individually and again after discussing it with
their neighbor. Some instructors ask the same
question several times, with different activities in
between rounds of voting designed to help students
better answer the question. For instance, an
instructor might have the students answer the
question individually, then discuss it with their
neighbor and respond, then participate in a
class-wide discussion and respond, and then listen
to a mini-lecture on the topic and respond. For
particularly challenging questions, this can be an
effective technique for helping students discover
and explore course material.
- Question-Driven
Instruction: This approach combines
contingent teaching and peer instruction. Lesson
plans consist entirely of clicker questions. Which
questions are asked depends entirely on how students
answer the questions. An instructor might come into
class with a stack of clicker questions, with
multiple questions on each topic. As students
perform well on clicker questions, the instructor
moves on to questions on new topics. As students
perform poorly, the instructor asks further
questions on the same topic. The instructor does not
have a lesson plan in the traditional sense when
using this approach. Instead, the course of the
class is determined reactively to demonstrated
student learning needs. See
Beatty for more on this approach.
- “Choose Your Own
Adventure” Classes: In this technique, an
instructor poses a problem along with several
possible approaches to solving it–perhaps approaches
suggested by students during class. The instructor
has the students vote on which approach to pursue
first, then explores that approach with the
students. Afterwards, the students vote on which
approach to pursue next.
2009 Study on Student Perceptions of iClickers
|
If you have trouble viewing this page due to a
disability, please contact us at webmaster@pnc.edu.
|
|
|